Michael Langer

989 citations
51 papers · 668 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Langer

48 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Michael Langer
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 194
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 312
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 325
  • Media Technology 83
  • Social Psychology 111
Replace Peter Vangorp with:
Peter Vangorp United Kingdom
Gary W. Meyer United States
Phillip J. Marlow Australia
Mikio Shinya Japan
Garrett Johnson United States
Ana Serrano Spain
Francene D. Reichel United States
Helge Seetzen Canada
Peter G. J. Barten Switzerland
Veronica Sundstedt Sweden
Michael Langer relative to Peter Vangorp United Kingdom Peter Vangorp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Peter Vangorp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Langer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Langer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Langer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Langer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Langer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Langer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Langer. The network helps show where Michael Langer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Langer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Langer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Langer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000109
2 2001106
3 199487
4 200937
5 200035
6 200123
7 200422
8 201122
9 200317
10 201516
11 201414
12 200014
13 200214
14 201613
15 200211
16 201210
17 200310
18 20139
19 20109
20 19979

About Michael Langer

Michael Langer is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Media Technology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (23 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (22 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (13 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Advanced Image Processing Techniques (7 papers), Color Science and Applications (6 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (6 papers) and Image Enhancement Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (194 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (312 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (325 citations), Media Technology (83 citations) and Social Psychology (111 citations). Michael Langer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include HH Bülthoff, Steven W. Zucker, Richard Mann, Fahim Mannan, Sébastien Roy, Vincent Couture, Scott McCloskey, Guy Wallis, Benjamin T. Backus and Gesche Huebner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, Color Research & Application and Perception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact