Michael Kölch

2.7k citations
199 papers · 1.6k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Kölch

172 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Kölch
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Clinical Psychology 952
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 310
  • Safety Research 114
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
  • Speech and Hearing 63
Replace Naomi R. Marmorstein with:
Naomi R. Marmorstein United States
Brady G. Case United States
W. Burleson Daviss United States
Masha Y. Ivanova United States
Joseph Woolston United States
Marijke B. Hofstra Netherlands
Bruce Waslick United States
Bernadka Dubicka United Kingdom
Eila Laukkanen Finland
Leo Wolmer Israel
Michael Kölch relative to Naomi R. Marmorstein United States Naomi R. Marmorstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Naomi R. Marmorstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Kölch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Kölch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Kölch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Kölch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Kölch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Kölch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Kölch. The network helps show where Michael Kölch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Kölch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Kölch Line = papers co-authored together Michael Kölch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 199 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011324
2 2014141
3 200680
4 201444
5 201041
6 200839
7 201436
8 200933
9 201230
10 201625
11 201424
12 200724
13 201221
14 201921
15 201021
16 201920
17 200820
18 201416
19 200816
20 201316

About Michael Kölch

Michael Kölch is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 199 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (56 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (29 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (27 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (22 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (21 papers), Health and Medical Studies (19 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (18 papers) and Medical and Health Sciences Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (952 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (310 citations), Safety Research (114 citations), Biological Psychiatry (24 citations) and Speech and Hearing (63 citations). Michael Kölch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jörg M. Fegert, Marc Schmid, Ferdinand Keller, Nina Spröber, Jasmin Grieb, Paul L. Plener, Klaus Schmeck, Romuald Brunner, Michael Kaess and Claudia Dölitzsch. Their work appears in journals such as Kindheit und Entwicklung, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact