Michael Kempa

15 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Michael Kempa
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Geography, Planning and Development 102
  • Museology 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 388
  • Space and Planetary Science 11
  • Social Psychology 177
Replace Jonathan Leib with:
Jonathan Leib United States
Ruth Craggs United Kingdom
Thomas Richards United States
Rodanthi Tzanelli United Kingdom
Donald Horne Australia
Martin Coward United Kingdom
Steven High Canada
Pauliina Raento Finland
Annelies Moors Netherlands
Lavinia Stan Canada
Michael Kempa relative to Jonathan Leib United States Jonathan Leib's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Jonathan Leib · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Kempa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Kempa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Kempa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Kempa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Kempa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Kempa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Kempa. The network helps show where Michael Kempa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael Kempa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Kempa Line = papers co-authored together Michael Kempa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2003263
2 200470
3 199965
4 200830
5 201025
6
Changes in Governance: A Cross-Disciplinary Review of Current Scholarship
200817
7 200417
8 200517
9 201813
10 200712
11 200210
12 19999
13 20005
14 20022
15
Policing in Canada in the 21st Century: Directions for Law Reform
20161
16
Hochaufgelöste Oberflächenbestimmung von Natursteinen und Orientierung von Bildern mit dem Facetten-Stereosehen
19951
17 20051
18 20101
19 20040

About Michael Kempa

Michael Kempa is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Law and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (11 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (2 papers) and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (102 citations), Museology (50 citations), Sociology and Political Science (388 citations), Space and Planetary Science (11 citations) and Social Psychology (177 citations). Michael Kempa has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn Strange, Clifford Shearing, Jennifer Wood, Les Johnston, Scott Burris, Michelle D. Bonner, John Cartwright and Philip Stenning. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Theoretical Criminology, Annals of Tourism Research, Police Practice and Research and European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact