Michael Kasperski

32 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Michael Kasperski
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Environmental Engineering 480
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 114
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 259
  • Computational Mechanics 139
  • Atmospheric Science 99
Replace Wei Cui with:
Wei Cui China
Jun Kanda Japan
J.R. Mayne United Kingdom
V. Valamanesh United States
Lunhai Zhi China
Aksel Fenerci Norway
Fabio Rizzo Italy
Zhuangning Xie China
Leighton Cochran United States
Michael Kasperski relative to Wei Cui China Wei Cui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Wei Cui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Kasperski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Kasperski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Kasperski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Kasperski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Kasperski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Kasperski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Kasperski. The network helps show where Michael Kasperski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Michael Kasperski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Kasperski Line = papers co-authored together Michael Kasperski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992113
2 199278
3 200271
4 200946
5 200344
6 199626
7 200026
8 200425
9 201025
10 201719
11 199716
12 199616
13 199812
14 200712
15 200612
16 20059
17 19959
18 19888
19 20078
20 19998

About Michael Kasperski

Michael Kasperski is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Computational Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (25 papers), Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis (8 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (8 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (5 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (5 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (5 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (5 papers) and Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (480 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (114 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (259 citations), Computational Mechanics (139 citations) and Atmospheric Science (99 citations). Michael Kasperski has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include H.‐J. Niemann, Emil Simiu, Massimiliano Gioffrè, Mircea Grigoriu, R.P. Hoxey, Holger Koss, Fahim Sadek, Sofia Maria Carrato Diniz, J.D. Holmes and C.P.W. Geurts. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Wind and Structures, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Cold Regions Science and Technology and Engineering Structures.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact