Michael I. Good

562 citations
25 papers · 348 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael I. Good

24 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Michael I. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Psychology 23
  • Clinical Psychology 147
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 96
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Ophthalmology 30
Replace Donald R. Ross with:
Donald R. Ross United States
Roy G. Fitzgerald United States
JOHN MOCK United States
Mircea Sigal Israel
F. Hassanyeh United Kingdom
Sally K. Severino United States
Feryal Çam Çelıkel Türkiye
F J Dunne United Kingdom
Vernon D. Patch United States
Costanza Andrisano Italy
Michael I. Good relative to Donald R. Ross United States Donald R. Ross's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Donald R. Ross · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael I. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael I. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael I. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael I. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael I. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael I. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael I. Good. The network helps show where Michael I. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Michael I. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael I. Good Line = papers co-authored together Michael I. Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197845
2 198236
3 197835
4 198934
5 197831
6 197731
7 199428
8 198122
9 199816
10 199310
11 20009
12 19948
13
SIGMUND FREUD: THE SECRETS OF NATURE AND THE NATURE OF SECRETS 1
19917
14 19767
15 19956
16 19965
17 20064
18 19913
19 20052
20 19992

About Michael I. Good

Michael I. Good is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, General Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers) and Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (23 citations), Clinical Psychology (147 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (96 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations) and Ophthalmology (30 citations). Michael I. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard I. Shader, Richard S. Surwit, David Shapiro and Ana‐María Rizzuto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, American Journal of Psychiatry, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, Psychiatric Services and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact