Michael Guenther

528 citations
27 papers · 352 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Guenther

26 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Michael Guenther
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Cancer Research 40
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 58
  • Pollution 32
  • Biomaterials 35
  • Oncology 56
Replace Guodong Chen with:
Guodong Chen China
Mingxia Zheng China
Jinbo Sun China
Stefan Bartsch Germany
Xin Deng China
Guoqing Zhang China
Xinxin Zhang China
Cordula Bittner Germany
Michael Guenther relative to Guodong Chen China Guodong Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Guodong Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Guenther

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Guenther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Guenther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Guenther more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Guenther

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Guenther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Guenther. The network helps show where Michael Guenther may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Guenther, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Guenther Line = papers co-authored together Michael Guenther links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201667
2 201437
3 200732
4 201231
5 201031
6 201019
7 202017
8 201814
9 201212
10 201212
11 201511
12 201110
13 202210
14 20228
15 20228
16 20237
17 20157
18 20134
19 20094
20 20093

About Michael Guenther

Michael Guenther is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), History of Medicine Studies (1 paper) and S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (40 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (58 citations), Pollution (32 citations), Biomaterials (35 citations) and Oncology (56 citations). Michael Guenther has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Susanne Zibek, Ernst Wagner, Thomas Rauwolf, Niki Baccile, R. H. Strasser, Steffen Rupp, Elisabeth Delbeke, Stefan Lorenz, Martin Braun and Stefan Boeck. Their work appears in journals such as EP Europace, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Langmuir and JNCI Cancer Spectrum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact