Michael Gillman

33 papers receiving 676 citations

Peers

Michael Gillman
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 458
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 216
  • Insect Science 191
  • Ecological Modeling 47
  • Plant Science 269
Replace R. G. Booth with:
R. G. Booth United Kingdom
Geir Hestmark Norway
Jan Šìpoš Czechia
G. Ernsting Netherlands
Kenichiro Shimatani Japan
T. Burgess United States
Kelvin M. Lloyd New Zealand
Romina D. Dimarco Argentina
Jan Divíšek Czechia
David R. Given New Zealand
Michael Gillman relative to R. G. Booth United Kingdom R. G. Booth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. G. Booth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gillman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gillman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gillman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gillman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gillman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gillman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gillman. The network helps show where Michael Gillman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gillman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Gillman Line = papers co-authored together Michael Gillman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002136
2 200196
3 199878
4 200173
5 198946
6 199727
7 199325
8 200822
9 201819
10 199817
11 202216
12 201015
13 200015
14 202312
15 200712
16 199711
17 199811
18 201911
19 199611
20 200310

About Michael Gillman

Michael Gillman is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (458 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (216 citations), Insect Science (191 citations), Ecological Modeling (47 citations) and Plant Science (269 citations). Michael Gillman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark C. Gardener, Hilary E. Erenler, Michael J. Crawley, M Dodd, Melanie J. Hatcher, Philip J.K. McGowan, Rosemary S. Hails, Jeff Ollerton, Jonathan Silvertown and James M. Bullock. Their work appears in journals such as Biodiversity and Conservation, Journal of Animal Ecology, Biotropica, International Journal of Astrobiology and Oecologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact