Michael Gates
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management
- Leadership and Management top 2%
Papers in
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 5
- Nursing Roles and Practices 2
-
- Global Health Workforce Issues 6
- Co-authors
- Cheryl B. Jones (6 shared papers)Trilokraj Tejasvi (1 shared paper)Rashid L. Bashshur (1 shared paper)Gary W. Shannon (1 shared paper)Joseph C. Kvedar (1 shared paper)Cynthia D. Connelly (2 shared papers)Jane M. Georges (2 shared papers)Barbara A. Mark (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nursing Outlook (3 papers)International Nursing Review (1 paper)Research in Nursing & Health (1 paper)Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (1 paper)Nurse Educator (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael Gates
17 papers receiving 480 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Research and Theory 110
- Leadership and Management 38
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 25
- Emergency Medical Services 128
- General Health Professions 276
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gates
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gates. The network helps show where Michael Gates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 154 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 8 | How do Medicare physician fees compare with private payers? | 1993 | 21 |
| 9 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 12 | State-level data book on health care access and financing | 1993 | 12 |
| 13 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 1 |
About Michael Gates
Michael Gates is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Sociology and Political Science, Research and Theory and Physiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (110 citations), Leadership and Management (38 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (25 citations), Emergency Medical Services (128 citations) and General Health Professions (276 citations). Michael Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl B. Jones, Trilokraj Tejasvi, Rashid L. Bashshur, Gary W. Shannon, Joseph C. Kvedar, Cynthia D. Connelly, Jane M. Georges, Barbara A. Mark, Joanne Spetz and Mark E. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Outlook, International Nursing Review, Research in Nursing & Health, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health and Nurse Educator.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.