Michael Frith

1.0k citations
26 papers · 441 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Virology top 10%
    • Rabies epidemiology and control
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Papers in

Michael Frith

23 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Michael Frith
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Virology 51
  • Epidemiology 192
  • Ophthalmology 50
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 73
  • Transportation 20
Replace Alison Schwarzwalder with:
Alison Schwarzwalder United States
Emmanuel Kwasi Abu Ghana
Bharat Gurnani India
Hannah Brindle United Kingdom
John Peterson United States
Meredith Campbell United States
Kirandeep Kaur India
Tammy Miller United States
Hirokazu Taniguchi Japan
Michael Frith relative to Alison Schwarzwalder United States Alison Schwarzwalder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Alison Schwarzwalder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Frith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Frith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Frith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Frith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Frith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Frith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Frith. The network helps show where Michael Frith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Michael Frith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Frith Line = papers co-authored together Michael Frith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199970
2 201760
3 198860
4 202151
5 199544
6 199741
7 200622
8 199815
9 200413
10 201913
11 20218
12 20228
13 20228
14 19934
15 19804
16 19794
17 20003
18 20183
19
The Journey Home: Flight Related Factors on Refugee Decisions to Return
20192
20 20032

About Michael Frith

Michael Frith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 26 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (51 citations), Epidemiology (192 citations), Ophthalmology (50 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (73 citations) and Transportation (20 citations). Michael Frith has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Leon F. Garner, Helen Owens, George W. Beran, Shane D. Johnson, Maurice Yap, Hannah Fry, Faten Ghosn, Alex Braithwaite, Miranda Simon and Alistair W. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Nature Medicine, Criminology and American Political Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact