Michael Emberger

37 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers

Michael Emberger
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Dermatology 200
  • Horticulture 8
  • Oncology 176
  • Cell Biology 83
  • Epidemiology 123
Replace Gloria H. Y. Lin with:
Gloria H. Y. Lin United States
L. Meunier France
Kathrin Held Germany
Y. Mérot Switzerland
E. Rosón Spain
Taizo Kato Japan
Kyu‐Seon Oh United States
Allan Dillner United States
Frédérique‐Anne Le Gal France
Jinhee Lee South Korea
Michael Emberger relative to Gloria H. Y. Lin United States Gloria H. Y. Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Gloria H. Y. Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Emberger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Emberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Emberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Emberger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Emberger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Emberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Emberger. The network helps show where Michael Emberger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Emberger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Emberger Line = papers co-authored together Michael Emberger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200754
2 201941
3 201236
4 200732
5 200332
6 201731
7 201930
8 200328
9 201126
10 200826
11 202222
12 200421
13 202221
14 201820
15 200320
16 200520
17 202016
18 202116
19 200916
20 200316

About Michael Emberger

Michael Emberger is a scholar working on Dermatology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cell Biology and Oncology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Skin and Cellular Biology Research (6 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (4 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (4 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (3 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (200 citations), Horticulture (8 citations), Oncology (176 citations), Cell Biology (83 citations) and Epidemiology (123 citations). Michael Emberger has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Hintner, Martin Laimer, Johann Bauer, Bernhard Zelger, Christoph M. Lanschuetzer, Peter Koelblinger, Barbara Kofler, G. Pohla‐Gubo, Roland Lang and Dominic V. Spagnolo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, American Journal of Dermatopathology, Experimental Dermatology, British Journal of Dermatology and Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact