Michael Ehrig

454 citations
9 papers · 388 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Ehrig

9 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Michael Ehrig
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 41
  • Inorganic Chemistry 143
  • Organic Chemistry 199
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 61
  • Filtration and Separation 12
Replace Anton Neubrand with:
Anton Neubrand Germany
T.V. Grimes United States
В. Б. Кобычев Russia
Robert A. Bell United States
Armel Stockis Belgium
S. Nakamura France
D. Hall Canada
Kwang Ming Lee Taiwan
N. M. Vitkovskaya Russia
Alan Ford United Kingdom
Michael Ehrig relative to Anton Neubrand Germany Anton Neubrand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Anton Neubrand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ehrig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ehrig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ehrig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ehrig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ehrig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ehrig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ehrig. The network helps show where Michael Ehrig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ehrig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Ehrig Line = papers co-authored together Michael Ehrig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1994125
2 199189
3 199384
4 199145
5 199133
6 19935
7 19913
8 19963
9 19921

About Michael Ehrig

Michael Ehrig is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (1 paper), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper), Atomic and Molecular Physics (1 paper), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (1 paper), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (1 paper) and Polymer crystallization and properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (41 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (143 citations), Organic Chemistry (199 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (61 citations) and Filtration and Separation (12 citations). Michael Ehrig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Reinhart Ahlrichs, Horst Weiß, Hans W. Horn, Marco Häser, Julia E. Rice, Stefan Brode, Wolfram Koch, Bernd Kuhn, Christoph Kölmel and Shridhar R. Gadre. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Physics Letters, Macromolecules and Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact