Michael E. Speer

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael E. Speer
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 381
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 98
  • Epidemiology 334
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 291
  • Sensory Systems 43
Replace Richard L. Schreiner with:
Richard L. Schreiner United States
Andrea Dotta Italy
John J. Botti United States
Charlotte Catz United States
Belavendra Antonisamy India
Diego Faggian Italy
Maria Katarzyna Borszewska-Kornacka Poland
Brian Reichman Israel
T. F. Fok Hong Kong
Hercília Guimarães Portugal
Michael E. Speer relative to Richard L. Schreiner United States Richard L. Schreiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.6×
Richard L. Schreiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Speer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Speer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Speer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Speer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Speer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Speer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Speer. The network helps show where Michael E. Speer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Speer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Speer Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Speer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980148
2 198486
3 200281
4 200576
5 198471
6 197671
7 197666
8 198453
9 198352
10 198952
11 200351
12 198647
13 200535
14 200635
15 198034
16 200833
17
Early detection of bacteremia in an outpatient clinic.
198531
18 197730
19 198528
20 198426

About Michael E. Speer

Michael E. Speer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (11 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (9 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (6 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (6 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (4 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (3 papers) and Respiratory viral infections research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (381 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (98 citations), Epidemiology (334 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (291 citations) and Sensory Systems (43 citations). Michael E. Speer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Arnold J. Rudolph, Howard P. Gutgesell, Harvey S. Rosenberg, Helen Mintz Hittner, Gary D.V. Hankins, Alastair H. MacLennan, Cindy Blifeld, Martha D. Yow, Karin B. Nelson and M. E. Blair Holbein. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pediatrics, PEDIATRICS, Pediatric Research, Acta Paediatrica and Clinics in Perinatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact