Michael E. Oakes
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Food Science top 5%
- Culinary Culture and Tourism
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Papers in
-
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling 11
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 8
- Food Science 16
- Culinary Culture and Tourism 15
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 8
- Co-authors
- Carole S. Slotterback (16 shared papers)Gary D. Coover (1 shared paper)Ann Forsyth (1 shared paper)Kathryn H. Schmitz (1 shared paper)Kristen Sullivan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Appetite (8 papers)Food Quality and Preference (7 papers)Psychology and Health (1 paper)Physiology & Behavior (1 paper)Journal of Applied Social Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael E. Oakes
27 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Applied Psychology 91
- Food Science 265
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 353
- Marketing 116
- Pharmacy 46
Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Oakes
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Oakes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Oakes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Oakes. The network helps show where Michael E. Oakes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 33 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 15 | Twin cities walking survey | 2003 | 11 |
| 16 | Bad Foods: Changing Attitudes About What We Eat | 2003 | 10 |
| 17 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 4 |
About Michael E. Oakes
Michael E. Oakes is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Food Science, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy and Applied Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Culinary Culture and Tourism (15 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (11 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (91 citations), Food Science (265 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (353 citations), Marketing (116 citations) and Pharmacy (46 citations). Michael E. Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carole S. Slotterback, Gary D. Coover, Ann Forsyth, Kathryn H. Schmitz and Kristen Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Food Quality and Preference, Psychology and Health, Physiology & Behavior and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.