Michael E. Oakes
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Food Science top 5%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Culinary Culture and Tourism
Papers in
-
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling 11
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 8
- Food Science 16
- Culinary Culture and Tourism 15
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 8
- Co-authors
- Carole S. Slotterback (16 shared papers)Gary D. Coover (1 shared paper)Kathryn H. Schmitz (1 shared paper)Ann Forsyth (1 shared paper)Kristen Sullivan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Appetite (8 papers)Food Quality and Preference (7 papers)Physiology & Behavior (1 paper)Journal of Applied Social Psychology (1 paper)Psychology and Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael E. Oakes
27 papers receiving 556 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Applied Psychology 91
- Food Science 253
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 344
- Marketing 110
- Pharmacy 39
Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Oakes
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Oakes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Oakes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Oakes. The network helps show where Michael E. Oakes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 64 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 40 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 15 | Twin cities walking survey | 2003 | 11 |
| 16 | Bad Foods: Changing Attitudes About What We Eat | 2003 | 10 |
| 17 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 4 |
About Michael E. Oakes
Michael E. Oakes is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Food Science, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy and Applied Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Culinary Culture and Tourism (15 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (11 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (91 citations), Food Science (253 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (344 citations), Marketing (110 citations) and Pharmacy (39 citations). Michael E. Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carole S. Slotterback, Gary D. Coover, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Ann Forsyth and Kristen Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Food Quality and Preference, Physiology & Behavior, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Psychology and Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.