Michael E. Field

4.5k citations
100 papers · 3.4k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Field

98 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Michael E. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Earth-Surface Processes 2k
  • Ecology 775
  • Environmental Chemistry 299
  • Oceanography 346
  • Geology 107
Replace Alan R. Orpin with:
Alan R. Orpin New Zealand
Joseph T.VE Kelley United States
Annamaria Correggiari Italy
Parijat Roy India
Samuel J. Bentley United States
Jean‐François Bourillet France
Daniel F. Belknap United States
Veit Hühnerbach United Kingdom
Jean‐Pierre Henriet Belgium
H. Gary Greene United States
Michael E. Field relative to Alan R. Orpin New Zealand Alan R. Orpin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Alan R. Orpin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Field. The network helps show where Michael E. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Field Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011170
2 1982169
3 1981167
4 2004122
5 1999114
6 2004107
7 2010100
8 199193
9 199993
10 200493
11 198790
12 199184
13 200976
14
Quaternary depositional environments of the Pacific Coast
198075
15 199175
16 199975
17 197667
18 200367
19 201064
20 200059

About Michael E. Field

Michael E. Field is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography and Atmospheric Science, having authored 100 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological formations and processes (58 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (29 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (18 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (8 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (6 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (4 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (3 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (2k citations), Ecology (775 citations), Environmental Chemistry (299 citations), Oceanography (346 citations) and Geology (107 citations). Michael E. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Curt D. Storlazzi, James V. Gardner, M. Katherine Presto, Donald J. P. Swift, ANNE E. JENNINGS, Fabio Trincardi, Michael H. Bothner, Andrea S. Ogston, Brian D. Edwards and Edwin P. L. Elias. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Geology, Geological Society of America Bulletin, Coral Reefs, AAPG Bulletin and Geology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact