Michael E. Colvin

159 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Michael E. Colvin
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 391
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 185
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 248
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 629
  • Cancer Research 247
Replace Katalin Tóth with:
Katalin Tóth Hungary
Michael J. Page United States
Leonard S. Lerman United States
Rolf Meyer Switzerland
M. O. Dayhoff United States
David M. Smith United Kingdom
Tomas Hansson Sweden
Wei Li China
Catherine A. Royer United States
Takehiro Ohta Japan
Michael E. Colvin relative to Katalin Tóth Hungary Katalin Tóth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Katalin Tóth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Colvin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Colvin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Colvin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Colvin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Colvin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Colvin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Colvin. The network helps show where Michael E. Colvin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Colvin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Colvin Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Colvin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 163 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010268
2 1996240
3 2005146
4 2001134
5 198384
6 200082
7 200676
8 201375
9 200671
10 200270
11 199259
12 200156
13 199555
14 200255
15 198853
16 199552
17 200051
18 200350
19 200449
20 199348

About Michael E. Colvin

Michael E. Colvin is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 163 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (42 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (19 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (15 papers), Marine and fisheries research (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (11 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (11 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (10 papers) and Free Radicals and Antioxidants (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (391 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (185 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (248 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (629 citations) and Cancer Research (247 citations). Michael E. Colvin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and France. Frequent co-authors include Carl F. Melius, Henry F. Schaefer, Edmond Y. Lau, Daniel Barsky, Mark G. Knize, Frederick T. Hatch, F.T. Hatch, Selim Şenkan, N.M. Marinov and James S. Felton. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Chemical Physics Letters, Biophysical Journal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact