Michael E. Colvin

163 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Michael E. Colvin
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 397
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 189
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 269
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 680
  • Hepatology 139
Replace Katalin Tóth with:
Katalin Tóth Hungary
Michael J. Page United States
Rolf Meyer Switzerland
M. O. Dayhoff United States
David M. Smith United Kingdom
Kazuo Nakamura Japan
Tomas Hansson Sweden
Wei Li China
Rainer Jaenicke Germany
Catherine A. Royer United States
Michael E. Colvin relative to Katalin Tóth Hungary Katalin Tóth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.9×
Katalin Tóth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Colvin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Colvin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Colvin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Colvin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Colvin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Colvin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Colvin. The network helps show where Michael E. Colvin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Colvin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Colvin Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Colvin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010273
2 1996246
3 2005152
4 2001147
5 200092
6 198385
7 200681
8 201378
9 200675
10 199271
11 200270
12 200162
13 200262
14 198861
15 199559
16 199556
17 198354
18 199354
19 200454
20 200052

About Michael E. Colvin

Michael E. Colvin is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 167 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (42 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (19 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (15 papers), Marine and fisheries research (11 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (11 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (11 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (10 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (397 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (189 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (269 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (680 citations) and Hepatology (139 citations). Michael E. Colvin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and France. Frequent co-authors include Carl F. Melius, Henry F. Schaefer, Daniel Barsky, Edmond Y. Lau, Mark G. Knize, Frederick T. Hatch, F.T. Hatch, N.M. Marinov, Selim Şenkan and James S. Felton. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Chemical Physics Letters, Biophysical Journal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A and Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact