Michael E. Chansky

1.8k citations
27 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Chansky

27 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael E. Chansky
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Emergency Medicine 718
  • Epidemiology 333
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 46
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 29
  • Neurology 53
Replace Shin Ahn with:
Shin Ahn South Korea
J. Hope Kilgannon United States
Sung Woo Moon South Korea
David Carlbom United States
Robert H. Boone Canada
Viktoria D. Mayr Austria
Matias Greve Lindholm Denmark
Daniel M. Rolston United States
Delphine Garrigue France
Janet M. Simsic United States
Michael E. Chansky relative to Shin Ahn South Korea Shin Ahn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Shin Ahn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Chansky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Chansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Chansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Chansky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Chansky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Chansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Chansky. The network helps show where Michael E. Chansky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Chansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Chansky Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Chansky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007298
2 2013173
3 2013138
4 2014121
5 2008118
6 200470
7 201566
8 200961
9 201249
10 199845
11 201343
12 200841
13 201441
14 201440
15 201227
16 200723
17 201120
18 200619
19 200813
20 201213

About Michael E. Chansky

Michael E. Chansky is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (718 citations), Epidemiology (333 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (46 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (29 citations) and Neurology (53 citations). Michael E. Chansky has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include J. Hope Kilgannon, Stephen Trzeciak, Brian W. Roberts, Joseph E. Parrillo, R. Phillip Dellinger, Neil Mittal, Steven M. Hollenberg, Stephen W. Trzeciak, Ryan C. Arnold and Barry I. Milcarek. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Emergency Medicine, Resuscitation, Critical Care Medicine, Journal of Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact