Michael E. Carney

40.1k citations
45 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Carney

45 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Michael E. Carney
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Reproductive Medicine 763
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 381
  • Oncology 258
  • Dermatology 56
  • Cancer Research 83
Replace Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung with:
Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung Canada
Elisabeth Åvall‐Lundqvist Sweden
Laurie Elit Canada
Marco Monti Italy
Christopher P. DeSimone United States
Joan Murphy Canada
Katina Robison United States
Susan A. Davidson United States
Patrick Imesch Switzerland
Paul R. Harnett Australia
Michael E. Carney relative to Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung Canada Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Carney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Carney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Carney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Carney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Carney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Carney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Carney. The network helps show where Michael E. Carney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Carney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Carney Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Carney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006334
2 2020211
3 2002174
4 2008167
5 199775
6 200469
7 200264
8 200960
9 201758
10 199955
11 200350
12 202045
13 200839
14 200935
15 200731
16 200726
17 201021
18 201121
19 199919
20 201419

About Michael E. Carney

Michael E. Carney is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (18 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (3 papers), PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (3 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (2 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (763 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (381 citations), Oncology (258 citations), Dermatology (56 citations) and Cancer Research (83 citations). Michael E. Carney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lynda Bergsma, Andrew Berchuck, Johnathan M. Lancaster, Clyde D. Ford, Alexander Tsodikov, Charles L. Wiggins, Marc T. Goodman, Joan L. Warren, Craig C. Earle and Marie Topor. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Control, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact