Michael E. Beck

52 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Michael E. Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Insect Science 548
  • Filtration and Separation 68
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 232
  • Organic Chemistry 612
  • Spectroscopy 208
Replace Orlando Crescenzi with:
Orlando Crescenzi Italy
Torbjörn Norin Sweden
Sannamu Lee Japan
Richard H. Henchman United Kingdom
Dennis L. Barton Canada
Herman J. C. Yeh United States
Patrick T. T. Wong Canada
C.-I. Brändén Sweden
Matthew M. Benning United States
Yun Ling China
Michael E. Beck relative to Orlando Crescenzi Italy Orlando Crescenzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.0×
Orlando Crescenzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Beck. The network helps show where Michael E. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Beck Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014283
2 2003264
3 2013239
4 2001238
5 2010207
6 2003187
7 2014102
8
PRINTS--a database of protein motif fingerprints.
199497
9 199487
10 199750
11 200549
12 200640
13 199733
14 199929
15 200327
16 202322
17 201021
18 199721
19 202021
20 199521

About Michael E. Beck

Michael E. Beck is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Insect Science, Mechanics of Materials, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (5 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (4 papers) and Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (548 citations), Filtration and Separation (68 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (232 citations), Organic Chemistry (612 citations) and Spectroscopy (208 citations). Michael E. Beck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ralf Nauen, Peter Jeschke, Frank Eckert, Andreas Klamt, Teresa K. Attwood, Michael Diedenhofen, Axel Koslowski, Walter Thiel, Robert F. Velten and Matthias Haas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Tribology Letters, Microsystem Technologies and ACS Chemical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact