Michael E. Amiel

16 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Michael E. Amiel
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Rheumatology 273
  • Urology 63
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 86
  • Surgery 219
  • Equine 8
Replace Ralf U. Kleemann with:
Ralf U. Kleemann Germany
Masahiko Matsusaki Japan
László Rudolf Hangody Hungary
Magdalena Mueller-Gerbl Switzerland
Jens M. Rubak Denmark
D. Versleyen Netherlands
Caroline G. Spiteri Canada
Eike H. Mrosek Germany
Shinichi Shirasawa Japan
Van W. Wong United States
Michael E. Amiel relative to Ralf U. Kleemann Germany Ralf U. Kleemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Ralf U. Kleemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Amiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Amiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Amiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Amiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Amiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Amiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Amiel. The network helps show where Michael E. Amiel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Amiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Amiel Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Amiel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2004112
2 200173
3 200368
4 200057
5 200053
6 199823
7 200020
8 199719
9
Disturbances caused by dental materials in magnetic resonance imaging.
199218
10
Transforming growth factor beta one (TGF-beta 1) enhancement of the chondrocytic phenotype in aged perichondrial cells: an in vitro study.
20008
11 20017
12 19974
13 19823
14 20012
15
Ioxaglate-carrying liposomes
19891
16 19901

About Michael E. Amiel

Michael E. Amiel is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 16 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (7 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (5 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Dental Radiography and Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (273 citations), Urology (63 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (86 citations), Surgery (219 citations) and Equine (8 citations). Michael E. Amiel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include David Amiel, Robert L. Sah, Albert C. Chen, Won C. Bae, Jennifer B. Massie, John G. Lane, Robert Healey, Kohei Kobayashi, Masaki Sonoda and Fred L. Harwood. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Journal of Orthopaedic Science and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact