Michael Dymock

23 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Michael Dymock
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 75
  • Toxicology 12
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 5
  • Nephrology 16
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 49
Replace Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen with:
Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen Denmark
Susanne M. A. J. Tielemans Netherlands
Ratana Panpanich Thailand
Agozie Chukwunedum Ubesie Nigeria
Archik Das United Kingdom
Odilija Rudzevičienė Lithuania
Marc-André Leclair Canada
Mehali Patel United Kingdom
Osarhumwese Osaretin Ojo United Kingdom
Joachim Dzidzor Sackey United States
Michael Dymock relative to Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen Denmark Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Kim Katrine Bjerring Clemmensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Dymock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Dymock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Dymock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Dymock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Dymock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Dymock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Dymock. The network helps show where Michael Dymock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Dymock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Dymock Line = papers co-authored together Michael Dymock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202071
2 202228
3 202019
4 202219
5 202118
6 202116
7 202113
8 202112
9 202110
10 202310
11 20238
12 20226
13 20215
14 20225
15 20235
16 20234
17 20232
18 20242
19 20242
20 20252

About Michael Dymock

Michael Dymock is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Toxicology, Statistics and Probability, Nutrition and Dietetics and Epidemiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (7 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (4 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (4 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (3 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (3 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (75 citations), Toxicology (12 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (5 citations), Nephrology (16 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (49 citations). Michael Dymock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Hazel Oddy, Gina Leslie Ambrosini, Gina Trapp, Kevin J. Murray, Geeta Appannah, Donna Tracy Geddes, Alethea Rea, Ching Tat Lai, Lisa Faye Stinson and Grant Justin Landers. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Scientific Reports, Journal of science and medicine in sport, The Medical Journal of Australia and Journal of Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact