Michael Conrad

5.7k citations
229 papers · 4.6k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Conrad

216 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Michael Conrad
Comparison fields: 5 of 192
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 651
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.1k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 533
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 456
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 288
Replace Steen Rasmussen with:
Steen Rasmussen United States
Robert Rosén United States
Norman H. Packard United States
H. H. Pattee United States
Walter Fontana United States
René Thom France
Jürgen Jost Germany
David Williams United Kingdom
Martin Gardner United States
W. Ebeling Germany
Michael Conrad relative to Steen Rasmussen United States Steen Rasmussen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Steen Rasmussen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Conrad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Conrad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Conrad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Conrad. The network helps show where Michael Conrad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Conrad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Conrad Line = papers co-authored together Michael Conrad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 229 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979263
2 1987257
3 1984165
4 1990155
5 1981140
6 1985136
7 1990100
8 197498
9 198397
10 197482
11 197080
12 199269
13 197969
14 199666
15 197264
16 198363
17 199459
18 197958
19 197951
20 199251

About Michael Conrad

Michael Conrad is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 229 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (36 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (31 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (21 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (20 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (19 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (18 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (18 papers) and Origins and Evolution of Life (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (651 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.1k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (533 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (456 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (288 citations). Michael Conrad has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include S. J. Singer, Peter Calow, Klaus‐Peter Zauner, Mateen M. Rizki, Jong‐Chen Chen, Petr Jarolı́m, H. H. Pattee, E.A. Liberman, Kevin G. Kirby and Mario Dal Cin. Their work appears in journals such as Biosystems, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Chaos Solitons & Fractals and Applied Mathematics and Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact