Michael Conrad

162 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Michael Conrad
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 569
  • History and Philosophy of Science 482
  • Artificial Intelligence 840
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 352
  • Molecular Biology 903
Replace Mark A. Bedau with:
Mark A. Bedau United States
Richard A. R. Watson United Kingdom
Steen Rasmussen United States
Robert Rosén United States
Christoph Adami United States
Norman H. Packard United States
Howard Hunt Pattee United States
Walter Fontana United States
Arthur W. Burks United States
Charles Ofria United States
Michael Conrad relative to Mark A. Bedau United States Mark A. Bedau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Mark A. Bedau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Conrad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Conrad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Conrad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Conrad. The network helps show where Michael Conrad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Conrad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Conrad Line = papers co-authored together Michael Conrad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 174 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979257
2 1984159
3 1990155
4 1985135
5 1990112
6 197496
7 198396
8 197482
9 197077
10 197969
11 199265
12 198363
13 197262
14 199662
15 199459
16 199054
17 197952
18 199250
19 197049
20 198549

About Michael Conrad

Michael Conrad is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 174 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA and Biological Computing (49 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (31 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (25 papers), Complex Systems and Dynamics (22 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (22 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (19 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (569 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (482 citations), Artificial Intelligence (840 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (352 citations) and Molecular Biology (903 citations). Michael Conrad has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Calow, Klaus‐Peter Zauner, Mateen M. Rizki, Jong‐Chen Chen, Howard Hunt Pattee, Efim A. Liberman, W. Güttinger, Mario Dal Cin, Harold M. Hastings and W. Ebeling. Their work appears in journals such as Biosystems, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Chaos Solitons & Fractals and Soft Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact