Michael Conklin

1.1k citations
60 papers · 709 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Conklin

35 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

Michael Conklin
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Statistics and Probability 124
  • Management Science and Operations Research 130
  • Marketing 74
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 11
  • Health Informatics 8
Replace José Ignacio Peláez with:
José Ignacio Peláez Spain
Peter Morgan United Kingdom
Katrien Antonio Belgium
Sarah Gelper Belgium
David H. Annis United States
Madelyn Glymour United States
Christina Beneki Greece
Anil Jadhav India
John Aldrich United Kingdom
Yasuo Amemiya United States
Michael Conklin relative to José Ignacio Peláez Spain José Ignacio Peláez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
José Ignacio Peláez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Conklin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Conklin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Conklin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Conklin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Conklin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Conklin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Conklin. The network helps show where Michael Conklin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael Conklin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Conklin Line = papers co-authored together Michael Conklin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001425
2 200383
3 200139
4 201438
5 200417
6 200513
7 201412
8 200510
9 20189
10 20109
11 20228
12 20157
13 20223
14 20213
15 20103
16 20203
17 20213
18 20072
19 20242
20 20212

About Michael Conklin

Michael Conklin is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 60 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (6 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (6 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (5 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (4 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers) and Business Law and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (124 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (130 citations), Marketing (74 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (11 citations) and Health Informatics (8 citations). Michael Conklin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stan Lipovetsky, James T. Fey, Justin Blount, Lawrence J. Trautman, Timothy Fukawa-Connelly, Christopher Houston, Robin L. Marcus and Jun Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Choice Modelling, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, Studies in Higher Education, European Journal of Operational Research and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact