Michael Comber
Impact in
- Chemical Health and Safety top 2%
- Chemical Safety and Risk Management
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Papers in
-
- Analytical chemistry methods development 4
-
- Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology 3
- Co-authors
- Mark Cronin (2 shared papers)John D. Walker (2 shared papers)Joanna S. Jaworska (2 shared papers)Andrew Paul Worth (2 shared papers)Paul John Worsfold (1 shared paper)Kevin N. Andrew (1 shared paper)John Richard Dean (2 shared papers)Thomas F. Parkerton (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (2 papers)Environmental Health Perspectives (2 papers)Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (1 paper)Analytical Letters (1 paper)Analytica Chimica Acta (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Michael Comber
10 papers receiving 571 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Chemical Health and Safety 24
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 236
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 151
- Environmental Chemistry 68
- Small Animals 66
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Comber
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Comber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Comber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Comber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Comber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Comber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Comber. The network helps show where Michael Comber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael Comber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 227 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 178 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 3 |
About Michael Comber
Michael Comber is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Pollution and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical chemistry methods development (4 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Environmental Chemistry and Analysis (2 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (1 paper), Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (1 paper), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper) and Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (24 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (236 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (151 citations), Environmental Chemistry (68 citations) and Small Animals (66 citations). Michael Comber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Cronin, John D. Walker, Joanna S. Jaworska, Andrew Paul Worth, Paul John Worsfold, Kevin N. Andrew, John Richard Dean, Thomas F. Parkerton, Robert H. Cumming and Malcolm J. Hetheridge. Their work appears in journals such as Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Environmental Health Perspectives, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Analytical Letters and Analytica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.