Michael Bütter

541 citations
20 papers · 121 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Bütter

16 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers

Michael Bütter
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Communication 34
  • Sociology and Political Science 94
  • Philosophy 15
  • Literature and Literary Theory 14
  • Health 8
Replace Кирилл Филимонов with:
Кирилл Филимонов Sweden
Jacobus A. Naudé South Africa
Matthew S. Nurse Australia
Travis L. Gosa United States
Erhard Schüttpelz Germany
Niels Werber Germany
Georg Stanitzek Germany
Elke Zobl Germany
Ricarda Drüeke Austria
Massimiliano Demata Italy
Michael Bütter relative to Кирилл Филимонов Sweden Кирилл Филимонов's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Кирилл Филимонов · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bütter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bütter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bütter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bütter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bütter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bütter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bütter. The network helps show where Michael Bütter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bütter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Bütter Line = papers co-authored together Michael Bütter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201538
2 202319
3 201414
4 201413
5 20167
6
The History of Conspiracy Theory Research: A Review and Commentary
20186
7 20245
8 20095
9 20214
10 20223
11
Conspiracy Theories – Conspiracy Narratives
20211
12 20101
13 20101
14 19971
15 20121
16 20101
17 20111
18 20250
19 20110
20 20150

About Michael Bütter

Michael Bütter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and Cultural Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 121 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (11 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), German History and Society (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (34 citations), Sociology and Political Science (94 citations), Philosophy (15 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (14 citations) and Health (8 citations). Michael Bütter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and China. Frequent co-authors include Peter Knight, P. L. Knight, Hans‐Bernd Schäfer, Alexander Bogner, Hannes Bergthaller, Michael Zürn, Martin Carrier, Patrick Keller, Eva Barlösius and Torsten Wilholt. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Review of American Studies, Minerva, Social research, Diogenes and Kyklos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact