Michael Brush
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 4
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Soo Borson (2 shared papers)James M. Scanlan (2 shared papers)Peter P. Vitaliano (1 shared paper)Richard D. DeVeaux (1 shared paper)Bridget Kelly (1 shared paper)Philip Chen (2 shared papers)Rod Walker (1 shared paper)Cecilia S. Lee (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (1 paper)Journal of Glaucoma (1 paper)Archives of Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Brush
5 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 432
- Psychiatry and Mental health 731
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 198
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 55
- Family Practice 42
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Brush
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Brush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Brush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Brush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Brush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Brush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Brush. The network helps show where Michael Brush may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Michael Brush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Mini-Cog: a cognitive ?vital signs? measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 1190 |
| 2 | 1998 | 329 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 |
About Michael Brush
Michael Brush is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Corneal surgery and disorders (1 paper) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (432 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (731 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (198 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (55 citations) and Family Practice (42 citations). Michael Brush has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Soo Borson, James M. Scanlan, Peter P. Vitaliano, Richard D. DeVeaux, Bridget Kelly, Philip Chen, Rod Walker, Cecilia S. Lee, Yu‐Ru Su and Eric B. Larson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Journal of Glaucoma and Archives of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.