Michael Brush

6 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Michael Brush's Hit Papers

The Mini-Cog: a cognitive ?vital signs? measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly 2000 · 1.3k citations
1.3k0+8+17Years since publication4008001.2k

Peers

Michael Brush
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 276
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 652
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 183
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 39
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 65
Replace Peijun Chen with:
Peijun Chen United States
A H Rifai United States
Gary Sinoff Israel
Syed H. Tariq United States
Kevin C. Fleming United States
Enrico Mossello Italy
John Cullen Australia
Régis Gonthier France
Conrad May United States
Reshma Aziz Merchant Singapore
Michael Brush relative to Peijun Chen United States Peijun Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Peijun Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Brush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Brush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Brush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Brush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Brush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Brush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Brush. The network helps show where Michael Brush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Michael Brush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Brush Line = papers co-authored together Michael Brush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
The Mini-Cog: a cognitive ?vital signs? measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly
Hit paper breakdown →
20001293
2 1998350
3 200252
4 200410
5 20049
6 20241

About Michael Brush

Michael Brush is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Ophthalmology, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (276 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (652 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (183 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (39 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (65 citations). Michael Brush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include James M. Scanlan, Soo Borson, Peter P. Vitaliano, Paul R. Solomon, Richard D. DeVeaux, Bridget Kelly, Philip Chen, Laura E. Gibbons, Cecilia S. Lee and Yu‐Ru Su. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Journal of Glaucoma, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Archives of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact