Michael Blocker
Impact in
- Microbiology top 5%
- Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
- Reproductive tract infections research
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Infection Control in Healthcare
- Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Papers in
-
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus 2
- Infection Control in Healthcare 1
-
- Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections 2
- Co-authors
- Michael E. St. Louis (1 shared paper)William C. Levine (1 shared paper)William A. Rutala (4 shared papers)Yuliya Lokhnygina (4 shared papers)Luke F. Chen (4 shared papers)Patricia Triplett (4 shared papers)Sarah S. Lewis (4 shared papers)Lauren P. Knelson (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1 paper)The Lancet Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Sexually Transmitted Diseases (1 paper)Infectious Disease Clinics of North America (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Blocker
9 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Microbiology 136
- Infectious Diseases 292
- General Dentistry 24
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 27
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 43
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Blocker
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Blocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Blocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Blocker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Blocker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Blocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Blocker. The network helps show where Michael Blocker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Blocker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 262 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 94 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 2 |
About Michael Blocker
Michael Blocker is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Microbiology, General Health Professions and Virology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (2 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Vibrio bacteria research studies (1 paper), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (1 paper), Food Safety and Hygiene (1 paper) and Infection Control in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (136 citations), Infectious Diseases (292 citations), General Dentistry (24 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (27 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (43 citations). Michael Blocker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. St. Louis, William C. Levine, William A. Rutala, Yuliya Lokhnygina, Luke F. Chen, Patricia Triplett, Sarah S. Lewis, Lauren P. Knelson, Deverick J. Anderson and Rebekah W. Moehring. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Infectious Disease Clinics of North America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.