Michaël Bishop

52 papers receiving 844 citations

Peers

Michaël Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • General Decision Sciences 154
  • History and Philosophy of Science 200
  • Philosophy 289
  • General Psychology 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 200
Replace K. I. Manktelow with:
K. I. Manktelow United Kingdom
Ruma Falk Israel
Bernard Berofsky United States
Paul Pollard United Kingdom
Brian Foss United Kingdom
Russell Revlin United States
Erik J Olsson Sweden
Pascal Engel France
Tobias Gerstenberg United States
Elijah Millgram United States
Michaël Bishop relative to K. I. Manktelow United Kingdom K. I. Manktelow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
K. I. Manktelow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Bishop. The network helps show where Michaël Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaël Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Michaël Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005172
2 2002120
3 200673
4 200655
5 199648
6 199947
7 200939
8 201239
9 200237
10 200636
11 200032
12 199728
13
Stich and His Critics
200926
14 200624
15 199821
16 200019
17 199819
18 202015
19 201913
20 200513

About Michaël Bishop

Michaël Bishop is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (4 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (4 papers) and Multimedia Communication and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (154 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (200 citations), Philosophy (289 citations), General Psychology (15 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (200 citations). Michaël Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Trout, Richard J. Samuels, Sanjay Rao, Stephen Stich, Yu-Wei Eric Sung, Kunwadee Sripanidkulchai, Stephen P. Stich, Susan Nolen–Hoeksema, Judith Larson and Ferran Mañé. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, International Journal of Integrated Care, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy Compass and International Journal of Cosmetic Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact