Michael Ansong

1.9k citations
35 papers · 497 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Ansong

34 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Michael Ansong
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 168
  • Ecological Modeling 53
  • Forestry 30
  • Horticulture 7
  • Global and Planetary Change 127
Replace Felipe Librán‐Embid with:
Felipe Librán‐Embid Germany
Simon L. Mitchell United Kingdom
Gertrud Schaab Germany
Marijke van Kuijk Netherlands
Rita Bastos Portugal
Anne‐Christine Mupepele Germany
Alice Di Sacco United Kingdom
Simoneta Negrete‐Yankelevich Mexico
Débora Cristina Rother Brazil
Fernando Gast Colombia
Michael Ansong relative to Felipe Librán‐Embid Germany Felipe Librán‐Embid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Felipe Librán‐Embid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ansong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ansong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ansong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ansong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ansong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ansong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ansong. The network helps show where Michael Ansong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ansong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Ansong Line = papers co-authored together Michael Ansong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201393
2 201462
3 201130
4 201827
5 201425
6 201324
7 201519
8 202019
9 201518
10 201218
11 202017
12 202315
13 202014
14 201614
15 201911
16 201611
17 202410
18 20209
19 20229
20 20218

About Michael Ansong

Michael Ansong is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Insect Science and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (8 papers), Forest Management and Policy (5 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (168 citations), Ecological Modeling (53 citations), Forestry (30 citations), Horticulture (7 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (127 citations). Michael Ansong has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Marina Pickering, Eivin Røskaft, Winston Adams Asante, Boateng Kyereh, Michael Arthur, R. P. Randall, Martin Hejda, Jan Pergl, Franz Essl and Mark van Kleunen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Invasions, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Journal of Land Use Science and Trees Forests and People.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact