Michael Ansong

1.9k citations
36 papers · 528 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Ansong

35 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

Michael Ansong
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Ecological Modeling 64
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 173
  • Forestry 31
  • Horticulture 7
  • Global and Planetary Change 129
Replace Felipe Librán‐Embid with:
Felipe Librán‐Embid Germany
Simon L. Mitchell United Kingdom
Marijke van Kuijk Netherlands
Gertrud Schaab Germany
Monika Bertzky United Kingdom
Rita Bastos Portugal
Anne‐Christine Mupepele Germany
Fernando Gast Colombia
Alice Di Sacco United Kingdom
Marcelo Matsumoto Brazil
Michael Ansong relative to Felipe Librán‐Embid Germany Felipe Librán‐Embid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Felipe Librán‐Embid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ansong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ansong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ansong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ansong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ansong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ansong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ansong. The network helps show where Michael Ansong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ansong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Ansong Line = papers co-authored together Michael Ansong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201398
2 201467
3 201130
4 201829
5 201325
6 201425
7 201522
8 201519
9 201219
10 202019
11 202017
12 201617
13 202316
14 202015
15 202412
16 201612
17 201911
18 201910
19 20209
20 20229

About Michael Ansong

Michael Ansong is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Insect Science and Social Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (8 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (5 papers), Forest Management and Policy (5 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (64 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (173 citations), Forestry (31 citations), Horticulture (7 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (129 citations). Michael Ansong has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Marina Pickering, Eivin Røskaft, Boateng Kyereh, Winston Adams Asante, Michael Arthur, Jan Pergl, Mark van Kleunen, Martin Hejda, Franz Essl and R. P. Randall. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Invasions, Journal of Land Use Science, Journal of Environmental Management and Austral Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact