Michael A. Cant

136 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Michael A. Cant
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Developmental Biology 384
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.1k
  • Aging 134
  • Ecology 1.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 799
Replace Andrew F. Russell with:
Andrew F. Russell United Kingdom
Allen J. Moore United States
Sasha R. X. Dall United Kingdom
Étienne Danchin France
Alastair J. Wilson United Kingdom
Jan Komdeur Netherlands
Nick J. Royle United Kingdom
András Liker Hungary
Jason B. Wolf United Kingdom
M. Justin O’Riain South Africa
Michael A. Cant relative to Andrew F. Russell United Kingdom Andrew F. Russell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Andrew F. Russell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Cant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Cant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Cant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Cant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Cant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Cant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Cant. The network helps show where Michael A. Cant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Cant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Cant Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Cant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015239
2 1999164
3 2000163
4 2015158
5 2008147
6 2001136
7 2010134
8 2015114
9 1998103
10 200295
11 200191
12 200684
13 201084
14 200882
15 201880
16 201079
17 199977
18 200976
19 201776
20 200672

About Michael A. Cant

Michael A. Cant is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 140 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (83 papers), Plant and animal studies (53 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (37 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (35 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (27 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (26 papers), Marine animal studies overview (18 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (384 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.1k citations), Aging (134 citations), Ecology (1.9k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (799 citations). Michael A. Cant has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rufus A. Johnstone, Jeremy Field, Hazel J. Nichols, Emma Vitikainen, Darren P. Croft, Daniel W. Franks, Sarah J. Hodge, Francis Mwanguhya, Faye J. Thompson and Kenneth C. Balcomb. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Animal Behaviour, Behavioral Ecology, The American Naturalist and Biology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact