Michael A. Bidus

605 citations
21 papers · 441 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael A. Bidus

21 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Michael A. Bidus
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Reproductive Medicine 177
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 133
  • Oncology 104
  • Cancer Research 53
  • Epidemiology 106
Replace Borut Kobal with:
Borut Kobal Slovenia
Lucía González‐Cortijo Spain
Andrea Puppo Italy
Tomoyuki Ichimura Japan
U. Metzger France
W. Schroeder Germany
Mongkol Benjapibal Thailand
Alan C. Schlaerth United States
Suk Bong Koh South Korea
Kohei Omatsu Japan
Michael A. Bidus relative to Borut Kobal Slovenia Borut Kobal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Borut Kobal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Bidus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Bidus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Bidus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Bidus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Bidus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Bidus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Bidus. The network helps show where Michael A. Bidus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Bidus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Bidus Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Bidus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200781
2 200659
3 200645
4 200632
5 200829
6 200227
7 200726
8 200922
9 200520
10 200617
11 200813
12 200512
13 200011
14 200610
15 20059
16 20057
17 20027
18 20105
19 19994
20 20043

About Michael A. Bidus

Michael A. Bidus is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (177 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (133 citations), Oncology (104 citations), Cancer Research (53 citations) and Epidemiology (106 citations). Michael A. Bidus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include G. Scott Rose, John C. Elkas, G. Larry Maxwell, Jeffrey D. Seidman, Gadisetti V.R. Chandramouli, Andrew Berchuck, John I. Risinger, Charles R. Boice, Louis A. Dainty and Jonathan A. Cosin. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact