MF Day

962 citations
24 papers · 631 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Insect Utilization and Effects 6
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 6
    • Insect Pest Control Strategies 4
    • Plant Virus Research Studies 4

MF Day

24 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

MF Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Insect Science 323
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 187
  • Plant Science 262
  • Genetics 154
  • Virology 18
Replace M. F. Day with:
M. F. Day Australia
G. E. Bucher Canada
J. E. Kleinjan United States
Robert F. Harwood United States
M. A. Di Deco Italy
M. M. J. Lavoipierre United States
Wayne A. Rowley United States
C. Vago France
Maurice T. James United States
E. L. Peyton United States
MF Day relative to M. F. Day Australia M. F. Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
M. F. Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by MF Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of MF Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MF Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MF Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by MF Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by MF Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MF Day. The network helps show where MF Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside MF Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with MF Day Line = papers co-authored together MF Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196466
2 195260
3 195450
4 195449
5 195342
6 195540
7 195235
8 195433
9 195229
10 199429
11 196126
12 195123
13 195120
14 195119
15 195118
16 195417
17 196615
18 195112
19 195311
20 196711

About MF Day

MF Day is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (4 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (3 papers) and Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (323 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (187 citations), Plant Science (262 citations), Genetics (154 citations) and Virology (18 citations). MF Day has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include H Irzykiewicz, Frank Fenner, Gwendolyn M Woodroofe, ML Dudzinski, Natasha Gilbert, R.F. Powning and S. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Zoology, Immunology and Cell Biology, Journal of Sugarbeet Research, Invertebrate taxonomy and Australian Journal of Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact