MF Day
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Insect Utilization and Effects 6
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 6
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 4
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 4
- Co-authors
- H Irzykiewicz (5 shared papers)Frank Fenner (1 shared paper)Gwendolyn M Woodroofe (1 shared paper)ML Dudzinski (1 shared paper)R.F. Powning (1 shared paper)Natasha Gilbert (1 shared paper)S. Roberts (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australian Journal of Zoology (4 papers)Immunology and Cell Biology (1 paper)Journal of Sugarbeet Research (1 paper)Australian Journal of Biological Sciences (16 papers)Invertebrate taxonomy (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
MF Day
24 papers receiving 443 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Insect Science 291
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 162
- Plant Science 224
- Genetics 130
- Horticulture 4
Countries citing papers authored by MF Day
This map shows the geographic impact of MF Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MF Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MF Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by MF Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by MF Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MF Day. The network helps show where MF Day may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside MF Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1964 | 59 | |
| 2 | 1952 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1954 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1954 | 38 | |
| 5 | 1953 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1955 | 33 | |
| 7 | 1952 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 29 | |
| 9 | 1952 | 26 | |
| 10 | 1954 | 26 | |
| 11 | 1951 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1951 | 18 | |
| 13 | 1951 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1951 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1966 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1954 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1951 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1953 | 9 |
About MF Day
MF Day is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (3 papers) and Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (291 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (162 citations), Plant Science (224 citations), Genetics (130 citations) and Horticulture (4 citations). MF Day has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include H Irzykiewicz, Frank Fenner, Gwendolyn M Woodroofe, ML Dudzinski, R.F. Powning, Natasha Gilbert and S. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Zoology, Immunology and Cell Biology, Journal of Sugarbeet Research, Australian Journal of Biological Sciences and Invertebrate taxonomy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.