Mette Underbjerg

511 citations
12 papers · 371 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mette Underbjerg

11 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Mette Underbjerg
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 291
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 84
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 39
  • General Health Professions 69
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 39
Replace Tina R. Kilburn with:
Tina R. Kilburn Denmark
US Kesmodel Denmark
Tine Brink Henriksen Denmark
Ayako Senju Japan
Vasiliki Leventakou Spain
Laura S. Bleker Netherlands
Jessica DiBari United States
Victoria Cribb United Kingdom
Xiao-min Jiang China
Kimberly Coleman‐Phox United States
Mette Underbjerg relative to Tina R. Kilburn Denmark Tina R. Kilburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tina R. Kilburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mette Underbjerg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Underbjerg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Underbjerg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Underbjerg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Underbjerg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Underbjerg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Underbjerg. The network helps show where Mette Underbjerg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mette Underbjerg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mette Underbjerg Line = papers co-authored together Mette Underbjerg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2013112
2 201256
3 201253
4 201249
5 201047
6 201417
7 201214
8 201512
9 20138
10 20122
11
The Effect of alcohol binge drinking in early pregnancy on child general intelligence
20121
12 20240

About Mette Underbjerg

Mette Underbjerg is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (8 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (7 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (291 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (84 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (39 citations), General Health Professions (69 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (39 citations). Mette Underbjerg has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Erik Lykke Mortensen, Tina R. Kilburn, Jacquelyn Bertrand, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Theresa Wimberley, US Kesmodel, Jakob Grove, Henrik Støvring, Poul Thorsen and Leiv S. Bakketeig. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, PLoS ONE, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Journal of Pregnancy and Scandinavian Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact