Mette Asmild

2.4k citations
44 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Mette Asmild

43 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mette Asmild
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.2k
  • Economics and Econometrics 784
  • Finance 241
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 166
  • Accounting 209
Replace Peter Bogetoft with:
Peter Bogetoft Denmark
Hung‐Jen Wang Taiwan
Suthathip Yaisawarng United States
Victor V. Podinovski United Kingdom
Kristiaan Kerstens France
R. Allen United Kingdom
Estelle Shale United Kingdom
Juan Aparicio Spain
Lennart Hjalmarsson Sweden
Valentin Zelenyuk Australia
Mette Asmild relative to Peter Bogetoft Denmark Peter Bogetoft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Peter Bogetoft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mette Asmild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Asmild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Asmild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Asmild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Asmild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Asmild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Asmild. The network helps show where Mette Asmild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Mette Asmild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mette Asmild Line = papers co-authored together Mette Asmild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004309
2 2006147
3 2010122
4 2004114
5 200792
6 201286
7 200685
8 200663
9 200362
10 201961
11 200956
12 200954
13 200750
14 201446
15 202045
16 201837
17 201835
18 200431
19 201330
20 200530

About Mette Asmild

Mette Asmild is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Finance and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (36 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (7 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (6 papers), Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (5 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (4 papers), Water resources management and optimization (4 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (1.2k citations), Economics and Econometrics (784 citations), Finance (241 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (166 citations) and Accounting (209 citations). Mette Asmild has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph C. Paradi, Jesús T. Pastor, Jens Leth Hougaard, Kent Matthews, Dorte Kronborg, C. A. Knox Lovell, Rasmus Nielsen, Helena Hansson, Tomas Baležentis and Max Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Productivity Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Omega, Aquaculture and Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact