Merete Bjerrum

64 papers receiving 835 citations

Peers

Merete Bjerrum
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 123
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
  • Occupational Therapy 26
  • Physiology 145
Replace Michiko Moriyama with:
Michiko Moriyama Japan
Beth A. Staffileno United States
Mi Yang Jeon South Korea
Robert G. Holleman United States
Janet K. Specht United States
Sibylle Reinsch United States
Manuel Alves Rodrígues Portugal
Melissa B. Weimer United States
Marian Wilson United States
Linda Johansson Sweden
Merete Bjerrum relative to Michiko Moriyama Japan Michiko Moriyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Michiko Moriyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Merete Bjerrum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Merete Bjerrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merete Bjerrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merete Bjerrum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Merete Bjerrum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merete Bjerrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merete Bjerrum. The network helps show where Merete Bjerrum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Merete Bjerrum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Merete Bjerrum Line = papers co-authored together Merete Bjerrum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018114
2 201167
3 200547
4 201534
5 201133
6 201633
7 200429
8 201529
9 200629
10 201629
11 201726
12 201626
13 201724
14 201824
15 201820
16 201820
17 202217
18 202216
19 201915
20 201815

About Merete Bjerrum

Merete Bjerrum is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 69 papers that have together received 855 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutrition and Health in Aging (13 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (123 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations), Occupational Therapy (26 citations) and Physiology (145 citations). Merete Bjerrum has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Preben Ulrich Pedersen, Claus Vinther Nielsen, Erik Elgaard Sørensen, Lene Bastrup Jørgensen, Malene Laursen, Marlene Briciet Lauritsen, Sasja Jul Håkonsen, Per Hove Thomsen, Erik Thorlund Parner and Sanne Lemcke. Their work appears in journals such as JBI Evidence Synthesis, BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare and Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact