Meredith Ray

1.6k citations
81 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Meredith Ray

73 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Meredith Ray
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 312
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 48
  • Physiology 121
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 69
Replace Giuseppe Di Maria with:
Giuseppe Di Maria Italy
Monica M. Vasquez United States
Mehmet Karadağ Türkiye
Oumin Shi China
Jennifer L. Schneider United States
Karl Smith-Byrne United Kingdom
James Im Canada
S Ferlito Italy
Ulla Breth Knudsen Denmark
Meredith Ray relative to Giuseppe Di Maria Italy Giuseppe Di Maria's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Giuseppe Di Maria · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Ray. The network helps show where Meredith Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Ray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Ray Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Ray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016142
2 201795
3 201756
4 201654
5 202150
6 201945
7 201441
8 201839
9 201733
10 202033
11 201932
12 201731
13 201129
14 201426
15 202026
16 201624
17 201123
18 201422
19 202219
20 201618

About Meredith Ray

Meredith Ray is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (28 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (6 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (312 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (48 citations), Physiology (121 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (69 citations). Meredith Ray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Raymond U. Osarogiagbon, Nicholas R. Faris, Matthew P. Smeltzer, Hongmei Zhang, James R. Hébert, James B. Burch, Wilfried Karmaus, Matthew Smeltzer, Shawn D. Youngstedt and Richard Bogan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, CHEST Journal and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact