Melissa Pyle

1.8k citations
35 papers · 979 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Melissa Pyle

34 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Melissa Pyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 583
  • Philosophy 265
  • Clinical Psychology 483
  • Social Psychology 406
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 133
Replace Heather Law with:
Heather Law United Kingdom
Deborah Windell Canada
Jaak Rakfeldt United States
John McGovern United Kingdom
Jo Hodgekins United Kingdom
Susannah Colbert United Kingdom
Catherine van Zelst Netherlands
Piotr Świtaj Poland
Agatha M. Conrad Australia
O. Saarento Finland
Melissa Pyle relative to Heather Law United Kingdom Heather Law's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Heather Law · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melissa Pyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa Pyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa Pyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa Pyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa Pyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa Pyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa Pyle. The network helps show where Melissa Pyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melissa Pyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melissa Pyle Line = papers co-authored together Melissa Pyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014150
2 2014148
3 201872
4 201365
5 201652
6 202051
7 201645
8 201844
9 201343
10 201335
11 201929
12 201429
13 201824
14 201320
15 201820
16 201818
17 202217
18 201912
19 201712
20 201611

About Melissa Pyle

Melissa Pyle is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and General Health Professions, having authored 35 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (27 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (16 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (13 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (4 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (583 citations), Philosophy (265 citations), Clinical Psychology (483 citations), Social Psychology (406 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (133 citations). Melissa Pyle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Anthony P. Morrison, Michèle D. Birtel, Lisa Wood, Eilish Burke, Sarah Alsawy, Karen Machin, Nicola Chapman, Rory Byrne, Paul French and Heather Law. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Stigma and Health and Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact