Melinda Ring

416 citations
32 papers · 197 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Melinda Ring

24 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Melinda Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Pharmacy 35
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 41
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Health Information Management 10
  • General Health Professions 34
Replace Molly A. Kantor with:
Molly A. Kantor United States
Julie E.M. McCullough United Kingdom
Marcela Rodrigues de Castro Brazil
Nicholas Jackson United States
YoonMyung Kim South Korea
D. Kumar United Kingdom
Jacqueline Davis Australia
Katharina Phillipp Austria
Anne Gannoni Australia
G. J. E. Oosterhuis Netherlands
Melinda Ring relative to Molly A. Kantor United States Molly A. Kantor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Molly A. Kantor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melinda Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melinda Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melinda Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melinda Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melinda Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melinda Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melinda Ring. The network helps show where Melinda Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melinda Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melinda Ring Line = papers co-authored together Melinda Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201845
2 201941
3 201430
4 201711
5 20167
6
Expanding the differential diagnosis of hemoptysis: mycotic aortic aneurysms.
20037
7 20176
8 20205
9 20185
10 20255
11 20244
12 20234
13 20174
14 20254
15 20233
16 20243
17 20253
18 20232
19 20182
20 20142

About Melinda Ring

Melinda Ring is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Pharmacy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (2 papers), Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (2 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (35 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (41 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations), Health Information Management (10 citations) and General Health Professions (34 citations). Melinda Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include David Victorson, Gaurava Agarwal, Neilé K. Edens, Elaine O. Cheung, Amy Locke, Robert Saper, Tieraona Low Dog, Marc Brodsky, Mikhail Kogan and Victor S. Sierpina. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Nutrients, The American Journal of Medicine, Academic Medicine and Medical Teacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact