Mel Major

18 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Mel Major
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 109
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 30
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
  • Neurology 18
  • Rehabilitation 6
Replace Ana Cristina Castro-Ávila with:
Ana Cristina Castro-Ávila United Kingdom
Ryota Fuke Japan
Ivo W. Soliman Netherlands
Paula Pinheiro Berto Brazil
Rajat Suri United States
Carl R Hinkson United States
Thijs C. D. Rettig Netherlands
Harriet Shannon United Kingdom
Whitney Rossman United States
Brita Fosser Olsen Norway
Mel Major relative to Ana Cristina Castro-Ávila United Kingdom Ana Cristina Castro-Ávila's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ana Cristina Castro-Ávila · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mel Major

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mel Major's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mel Major with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mel Major more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mel Major

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mel Major. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mel Major. The network helps show where Mel Major may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mel Major, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mel Major Line = papers co-authored together Mel Major links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201694
2 202133
3 201924
4 202220
5 202312
6 202411
7 202411
8 20209
9 20199
10 20246
11 20254
12 20234
13 20234
14 20243
15 20202
16 20231
17 20231
18
Surviving critical illness: what is next?
20161
19 20240
20 20250

About Mel Major

Mel Major is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sociology and Political Science and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (109 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (30 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations), Neurology (18 citations) and Rehabilitation (6 citations). Mel Major has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marike van der Schaaf, Raoul Engelbert, Daniela Dettling-Ihnenfeldt, Frans Nollet, Christina Jones, David McWilliams, Shane Patman, Rik Gosselink, Dale M. Needham and R. Kwakman. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Critical Care, Australian Critical Care, International Journal of Nursing Studies and The Gerontologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact