Mei-Hui Chen

923 citations
42 papers · 642 · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Accounting top 5%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Corporate Governance and Financial Management

Papers in

Mei-Hui Chen

39 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Mei-Hui Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Accounting 161
  • Strategy and Management 92
  • Finance 42
  • Marketing 28
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 6
Replace Chih‐Chen Lee with:
Chih‐Chen Lee United States
Shikha Bhatia India
Sandeep Arora India
Sukhdev Singh India
Mohamed Sherif United Kingdom
Eunho Cho United States
Jee Hyun Park South Korea
Hien Thu Nguyen Vietnam
Mei-Hui Chen relative to Chih‐Chen Lee United States Chih‐Chen Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Chih‐Chen Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mei-Hui Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mei-Hui Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mei-Hui Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mei-Hui Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mei-Hui Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mei-Hui Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mei-Hui Chen. The network helps show where Mei-Hui Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mei-Hui Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mei-Hui Chen Line = papers co-authored together Mei-Hui Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017128
2 201370
3 201964
4 201744
5 201538
6 200637
7 201334
8 202027
9 199925
10 201624
11 201613
12 201813
13 202012
14 202112
15 200612
16 20239
17 20238
18 20148
19 20037
20 19976

About Mei-Hui Chen

Mei-Hui Chen is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting, Education, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Molecular Biology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (3 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (161 citations), Strategy and Management (92 citations), Finance (42 citations), Marketing (28 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (6 citations). Mei-Hui Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zhi Wang, Chen‐Lung Chin, Gerald J. Lobo, Jeff Zeyun Chen, Jianbo He, Dingkun Lin, Berlin Wu, Susan M. Abmayr, Rongbiao Pi and Lakshmi Balagopalan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuro-Oncology, BMC Oral Health, PLoS ONE, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy and National Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact