Meg Waraczynski

628 citations
28 papers · 519 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Meg Waraczynski

28 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Meg Waraczynski
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 276
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 237
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 49
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
  • Neurology 50
Replace Phoebe Collins with:
Phoebe Collins United Kingdom
Jonathan Wood United Kingdom
Kent Conover Canada
Philip Jean-Richard-dit-Bressel Australia
Kwangyeol Baek United Kingdom
Nuria Doñamayor Germany
Mercedes Arroyo United Kingdom
Paul J. Cocker Canada
Koji Toda Japan
Mieke van Holstein Netherlands
Meg Waraczynski relative to Phoebe Collins United Kingdom Phoebe Collins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Phoebe Collins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Waraczynski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Waraczynski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Waraczynski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Waraczynski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Waraczynski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Waraczynski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Waraczynski. The network helps show where Meg Waraczynski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Meg Waraczynski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg Waraczynski Line = papers co-authored together Meg Waraczynski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199670
2 200557
3 198745
4 198836
5 199130
6 198723
7 201821
8 200020
9 199820
10 199019
11 201618
12 199118
13 200317
14 198815
15 201012
16 200011
17 199211
18 199811
19 199511
20 200710

About Meg Waraczynski

Meg Waraczynski is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (276 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (237 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations) and Neurology (50 citations). Meg Waraczynski has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James R. Stellar, John E. Calamari, Peter Shizgal, Joanna Mazur, C. R. Gallistel, F. Scott Hall, Catherine W. M. Chan, Ashley Acheson, John P. Bruno and Joel M. Kaplan. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Brain Research, Physiology & Behavior, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact