M.E. Khan

24 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

M.E. Khan
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Gender Studies 66
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 118
  • Health 50
  • General Health Professions 103
  • Safety Research 36
Replace Bamikale J. Feyisetan with:
Bamikale J. Feyisetan United States
Nandini Oomman United States
T.K. Sundari Ravindran India
Marcie Rubardt United States
Ivy Kodzi United States
J. Douglas Storey United States
Melanie Frost United Kingdom
Oluwaseyi Dolapo Somefun South Africa
Chi‐Chi Undie Kenya
Omar Robles United States
M.E. Khan relative to Bamikale J. Feyisetan United States Bamikale J. Feyisetan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Bamikale J. Feyisetan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.E. Khan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.E. Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.E. Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.E. Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.E. Khan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.E. Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.E. Khan. The network helps show where M.E. Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside M.E. Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.E. Khan Line = papers co-authored together M.E. Khan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992123
2 200249
3
Men in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: Reproductive Health Issues
199938
4 201631
5 201527
6
Sexuality, Gender Roles, and Domestic Violence in South Asia
201414
7 201512
8 201410
9 201010
10 20089
11 20029
12 19859
13 20048
14 20035
15
Fertility control in India : a critical evaluation of the role of incentives in promoting sterilization among industrial workers
19805
16 20104
17 19804
18 19873
19 20092
20 20061

About M.E. Khan

M.E. Khan is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Gender Studies, having authored 26 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (13 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (7 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (5 papers), Sex work and related issues (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (66 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (118 citations), Health (50 citations), General Health Professions (103 citations) and Safety Research (36 citations). M.E. Khan has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lenore Manderson, John Townsend, Ubaidur Rob, Avishek Hazra, Moazzam Ali, Deepthi S. Varma, Jaleel Ahmad, Anvita Dixit, Arupendra Mozumdar and Pertti J. Pelto. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Family Planning, Health Policy and Planning, Population and Development Review, Injury Prevention and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact