M.C. Lobo

88 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

M.C. Lobo
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Pollution 1.2k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 246
  • Environmental Chemistry 347
  • Soil Science 290
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 380
Replace Yili Liang with:
Yili Liang China
Hemen Sarma India
Yasser M. Awad Egypt
Yongzhen Ding China
Thierry Lebeau France
Sutapa Bose India
Ayansina Segun Ayangbenro South Africa
David Fernández‐Calviño Spain
Safdar Bashir Pakistan
Christopher A. Impellitteri United States
M.C. Lobo relative to Yili Liang China Yili Liang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Yili Liang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Lobo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Lobo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Lobo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Lobo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Lobo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Lobo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Lobo. The network helps show where M.C. Lobo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.C. Lobo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.C. Lobo Line = papers co-authored together M.C. Lobo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011171
2 2016134
3 2017118
4 2016116
5 201997
6 201486
7 198986
8 199686
9 201384
10 201580
11 201170
12 202070
13 201969
14 200666
15 201465
16 201563
17 201055
18 201451
19 201550
20 197347

About M.C. Lobo

M.C. Lobo is a scholar working on Pollution, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heavy metals in environment (42 papers), Environmental remediation with nanomaterials (20 papers), Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques (14 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (12 papers), Chromium effects and bioremediation (10 papers), Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques (9 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (9 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (1.2k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (246 citations), Environmental Chemistry (347 citations), Soil Science (290 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (380 citations). M.C. Lobo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include M. Gil-Díaz, J. Alonso, Araceli Pérez‐Sanz, J.R. Gallego, Eduardo Rodríguez-Valdés, Carmen Fajardo, Diego Baragaño, I. Sastre, M. Nande and Luis Ortiz. Their work appears in journals such as Chemosphere, The Science of The Total Environment, Water Air & Soil Pollution, Journal of Environmental Management and Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact