Maya Schöck

678 citations
11 papers · 616 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Maya Schöck

11 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

Maya Schöck
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 300
  • Biomedical Engineering 363
  • Condensed Matter Physics 62
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 277
  • Materials Chemistry 185
Replace Marie‐Christine Blüm with:
Marie‐Christine Blüm Switzerland
Dirk Kühne Germany
Thorsten U. Kampen Germany
Gaochen Gu China
Tobias Meier Switzerland
Sushobhan Joshi Germany
Elizabeta Ćavar Switzerland
Greg Pawin United States
Keisuke Katayama Japan
R. Schillinger Germany
Maya Schöck relative to Marie‐Christine Blüm Switzerland Marie‐Christine Blüm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Marie‐Christine Blüm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maya Schöck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maya Schöck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maya Schöck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maya Schöck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maya Schöck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maya Schöck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maya Schöck. The network helps show where Maya Schöck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Maya Schöck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maya Schöck Line = papers co-authored together Maya Schöck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005339
2 200797
3 200649
4 200146
5 200036
6 200017
7 200314
8 20068
9 20055
10 20043
11 20032

About Maya Schöck

Maya Schöck is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Biophysics and Spectroscopy, having authored 11 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (3 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers) and Fuel Cells and Related Materials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (300 citations), Biomedical Engineering (363 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (62 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (277 citations) and Materials Chemistry (185 citations). Maya Schöck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and France. Frequent co-authors include Ivan Stensgaard, Erik Lægsgaard, Roberto Otero, Flemming Besenbacher, Luis M. Molina, Bjørk Hammer, Christoph Sürgers, Hilbert v. Löhneysen, Ross E. A. Kelly and H. v. Löhneysen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Small, The European Physical Journal B, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact