Maximilian Epple

841 citations
10 papers · 752 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Maximilian Epple

9 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

Maximilian Epple
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 556
  • Condensed Matter Physics 163
  • Materials Chemistry 248
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 94
  • Atmospheric Science 81
Replace M. Blanc with:
M. Blanc Switzerland
B. G. Briner Germany
V. M. Zhilin Russia
Kai‐Felix Braun Germany
J. A. Smerdon United Kingdom
L. Niebergall Germany
Adolf Winkler Austria
Masakuni Okamoto Japan
C. Didiot France
Puneet Mishra India
Maximilian Epple relative to M. Blanc Switzerland M. Blanc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
M. Blanc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maximilian Epple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maximilian Epple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maximilian Epple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maximilian Epple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maximilian Epple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maximilian Epple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maximilian Epple. The network helps show where Maximilian Epple may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maximilian Epple, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maximilian Epple Line = papers co-authored together Maximilian Epple links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2002242
2 2003190
3 2005143
4 200259
5 199746
6 200530
7 200422
8 199811
9 20039
10 20260

About Maximilian Epple

Maximilian Epple is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (4 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (2 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (556 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (163 citations), Materials Chemistry (248 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (94 citations) and Atmospheric Science (81 citations). Maximilian Epple has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Harald Brune, Klaus Kern, Nicolás Weiss, S. Rusponi, Tristan Cren, Nikolaus Knorr, M. Alexander Schneider, Klaus Kuhnke, René Becker and Philippe Ohresser. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Insects, Langmuir and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact