Max Weisbuch

2.8k citations
54 papers · 2.1k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Max Weisbuch

52 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Max Weisbuch
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Applied Psychology 339
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 598
  • Social Psychology 904
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 541
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 70
Replace Timothy Ketelaar with:
Timothy Ketelaar United States
Matthias Bluemke Germany
Mark Rotteveel Netherlands
Gian C. Gonzaga United States
Nicola Baumann Germany
Sylvia A. Morelli United States
Miguel Kazén Germany
Sarah Teige‐Mocigemba Germany
Jessica Vera-Bermudez Spain
Benjamin M. Wilkowski United States
Max Weisbuch relative to Timothy Ketelaar United States Timothy Ketelaar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Timothy Ketelaar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Weisbuch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Weisbuch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Weisbuch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Weisbuch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Weisbuch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Weisbuch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Weisbuch. The network helps show where Max Weisbuch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Weisbuch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Weisbuch Line = papers co-authored together Max Weisbuch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004250
2 2009141
3 2008134
4 2009129
5 2004115
6 2009100
7 2011100
8 200995
9 200990
10 200785
11 201066
12 200155
13 201047
14 201246
15 201043
16 201040
17 201440
18 200934
19 200932
20 200931

About Max Weisbuch

Max Weisbuch is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (25 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (16 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (339 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (598 citations), Social Psychology (904 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (541 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (70 citations). Max Weisbuch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nalini Ambady, Mark D. Seery, Jim Blascovich, Kristin Pauker, Reginald B. Adams, Zorana Ivčević, Michael L. Slepian, S. Brooke Vick, Diane M. Mackie and Nicholas O. Rule. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Emotion, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior and Social Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact