Max Gillman

1.3k citations
71 papers · 745 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Max Gillman

65 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

Max Gillman
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 420
  • Economics and Econometrics 629
  • Finance 148
  • Accounting 123
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Paul Hubert with:
Paul Hubert France
Isabel Vansteenkiste Germany
Emiliano Santoro Denmark
Max Floetotto United States
Nina Budina United States
Jérôme Creel France
Andrea Colciago Italy
Guillermo Vuletin United States
Rémy Lecat France
Fabio Rumler Austria
Max Gillman relative to Paul Hubert France Paul Hubert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Paul Hubert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Gillman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Gillman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Gillman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Gillman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Gillman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Gillman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Gillman. The network helps show where Max Gillman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Max Gillman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Gillman Line = papers co-authored together Max Gillman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200490
2 199377
3 200950
4 201433
5 202130
6
Econometric Accounting of the Australian Corporate Tax Rates: a Firm Panel Example
200526
7 200925
8 200124
9 200922
10 199519
11 200519
12 200918
13 201017
14 200616
15 200416
16 201916
17 200813
18 200313
19
The determinants of corporate effective tax rates
200213
20
Modelling the effect of inflation: growth, levels, and Tobin.
200213

About Max Gillman

Max Gillman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Accounting and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 71 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (37 papers), Economic theories and models (31 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (26 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (26 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (12 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (10 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (5 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (420 citations), Economics and Econometrics (629 citations), Finance (148 citations), Accounting (123 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Max Gillman has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michal Kejak, Mark N. Harris, Antón Nákov, Szilárd Benk, Simon Feeny, László Mátyás, Glenn Otto, T. Eade, Ákos Valentinyi and Emrah İsmail Çevik. Their work appears in journals such as Economica, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Journal of Human Capital, Economics of Transition and Journal of Monetary Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact