Max Fine

2.1k citations
30 papers · 1.7k · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Max Fine

27 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Max Fine's Hit Papers

A Follow-up Study 1990 · 1.1k citations
1.1k0+12+24Years since publication2505007501000

Peers

Max Fine
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Ophthalmology 280
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 559
  • Dermatology 66
  • Surgery 308
  • Rheumatology 102
Replace Richard L. Abbott with:
Richard L. Abbott United States
Charles M. Glasier United States
Charles M. Zacks United States
Anat Kesler Israel
H. Bruce Williams Canada
W. Henry Hollinshead United States
Kyösti Oikarinen Finland
Donald D. Matson United States
Ernest A. Weymuller United States
Yoav P. Talmi Israel
Max Fine relative to Richard L. Abbott United States Richard L. Abbott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard L. Abbott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Fine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Fine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Fine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Fine. The network helps show where Max Fine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Max Fine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Fine Line = papers co-authored together Max Fine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A Follow-up Study
Hit paper breakdown →
19901051
2 197486
3 198284
4 198358
5 197154
6 197647
7 197746
8 196633
9
Late degenerative changes in the cornea following breaks in Descemet's membrane.
196731
10 198429
11
Histocompatibility typing and corneal transplantation.
197429
12 196428
13 197527
14 197821
15 195319
16 196418
17 195813
18 195512
19 19698
20 19718

About Max Fine

Max Fine is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Surgery, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (20 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (16 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers) and Ocular Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (280 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (559 citations), Dermatology (66 citations), Surgery (308 citations) and Rheumatology (102 citations). Max Fine has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Abbott, Charles M. Zacks, Irmgard S. Wood, Michael J. Hogan, R. K. Forster, Patrick G Paglen, Robert G. Webster, Ernest Guillet, David M. Meisler and Milton Flocks. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Cornea, International Ophthalmology Clinics and Archives of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact