Maud Ellmann

1.4k citations
45 papers · 566 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
    • Samuel Beckett and Modernism
  • History top 2%
    • Travel Writing and Literature

Papers in

Maud Ellmann

29 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Maud Ellmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Literature and Literary Theory 235
  • History 104
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 42
  • General Psychology 8
  • Philosophy 62
Replace Mary Jacobus with:
Mary Jacobus United States
Susan S. Lanser United States
Laura Marcus United Kingdom
Denis Hollier
Dianne Chisholm Canada
D. H. Lawrence United States
J. Edward Chamberlin Canada
Georges Gusdorf Spain
Lilian R. Fürst United States
Isabelle de Courtivron
Maud Ellmann relative to Mary Jacobus United States Mary Jacobus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Mary Jacobus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maud Ellmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Ellmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Ellmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Ellmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Ellmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Ellmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Ellmann. The network helps show where Maud Ellmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Maud Ellmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maud Ellmann Line = papers co-authored together Maud Ellmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993161
2
On Murder, Mourning and Melancholia
2005103
3 200390
4 198885
5 201039
6 201419
7 200411
8 20146
9
The hunger artists
19936
10 20005
11 19895
12 20044
13 20094
14 20173
15 20133
16 20192
17 20172
18 19892
19 19922
20 20102

About Maud Ellmann

Maud Ellmann is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Surgery, having authored 45 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (11 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (11 papers), Samuel Beckett and Modernism (6 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper) and Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (235 citations), History (104 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (42 citations), General Psychology (8 citations) and Philosophy (62 citations). Maud Ellmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William Pratt, Sigmund Freud, Margot Norris, Michael Rubenstein, Sean Latham, Jonathan W. Goldman, Daniel Pick, Paul K. Saint‐Amour, T. S. Eliot and Marjorie Howes. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford Literary Review, Modern Philology, Critical Quarterly, The Modern Language Review and Essays in Criticism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact