Matthew Phillips

34 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Matthew Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Occupational Therapy 121
  • Aging 30
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 48
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 52
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 76
Replace Richard Shell with:
Richard Shell United States
David Brindley United Kingdom
Luís Montoro Spain
Fredrik A. Dahl Norway
Lucy Lu Wang United States
Chuan Hong United States
Min Lin United States
Guoqing Diao United States
Yen‐Chun Lin Taiwan
Gerard P. Brennan United States
Matthew Phillips relative to Richard Shell United States Richard Shell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Richard Shell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Phillips. The network helps show where Matthew Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003122
2 200694
3 201683
4 200883
5 201472
6 201872
7 201150
8 201239
9 201032
10 202030
11 201027
12 201026
13 201025
14 201524
15 201524
16 201623
17 201120
18 200217
19 202116
20
Fighting with fire--how bushfire suppression can impact on fire fighters' health.
200715

About Matthew Phillips

Matthew Phillips is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology, Occupational Therapy, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 989 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (2 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers) and Agriculture and Farm Safety (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (121 citations), Aging (30 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (48 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (52 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (76 citations). Matthew Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claire M. Thomas, Robert R. Sandusky, Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski‐Sobieski, Ying He, Efpraxia D. Zamani, Brad Aisbett, David S. Nichols, Mahua Mukhopadhyay, Heiner Westphal and Kevin Netto. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, Trials, International Journal of Cardiology, Developmental Biology and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact