Matthew Eames

795 citations
23 papers · 568 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Eames

22 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Matthew Eames
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 260
  • Neurology 153
  • Biomedical Engineering 336
  • Neurology 29
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 10
Replace John Snell with:
John Snell United States
Mohamad Khaled United States
Yangzi Qiao China
Gilat Schiff Israel
Shuki Vitek Israel
Eugen Hlasny Canada
Jianbo Tang China
Léandre Pourcelot France
Günter Seidel Germany
Lori Foley United States
Matthew Eames relative to John Snell United States John Snell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John Snell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Eames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Eames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Eames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Eames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Eames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Eames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Eames. The network helps show where Matthew Eames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Eames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Eames Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Eames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013124
2 201284
3 201262
4 201554
5 201248
6 201345
7 201437
8 201421
9 201517
10 202113
11 200613
12 200811
13 20228
14 20067
15 20206
16 20094
17 20153
18 20233
19 20123
20 20062

About Matthew Eames

Matthew Eames is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Mechanics of Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (13 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (12 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (5 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (260 citations), Neurology (153 citations), Biomedical Engineering (336 citations), Neurology (29 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (10 citations). Matthew Eames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Snell, Neal F. Kassell, Max Wintermark, Stephen J. Monteith, W. Jeff Elias, Jason P. Sheehan, Jean‐François Aubry, Ricky Medel, Eyal Zadicario and G. Wilson Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, Medical Physics, Neurosurgery, Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound and Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact